| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | My opinion... Definitely the unrated version. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
My opinion... Definitely the unrated version. From my understanding it makes the most sense. |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
My opinion... Definitely the unrated version.
From my understanding it makes the most sense. I agree, though I did post a (IMO and not knowing the difficulty of implementing such a thing, lol) viable solution in the other thread that would appease both sides: In editing a profile, beneath the rating (where the official rating and rating details be provided) could be a checkbox indicating there is also an unrated version on the disc, then on the profile itself, next to the rating it would state NR. I guess it would be similar in showing that the same disc has a widescreen and full screen version (in the display at least). | | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't use the parental controls, but if one does, how does the rating affect which users see which profiles? Does it help to include or exclude profiles if the rated version is used for the rating of the profile? | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | There is no real rule to it... Unrated could go either way. But in my experience for movies Unrated is mostly worse then the rated version. I don't know how it works with the parental controls as I just don't use them. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMovieman: Quote:
...
Sorry if I did this incorrectly, I don't often make polls. Well, never, actually.  Looks like it works. For this question, I can't be a help. In Germany this question is easy to treat, but this doesn't help. |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unrated because (in theory) that's the 'worst' rating. It hasn't gone through the academy and many times has more blood and gore (in the horror genre, at least), so it should take precedence if there's a rated version. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,945 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unrated | | | | www.tvmaze.com |
|
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unrated. Granted, a lot of times the unrated is no worse in terms of content, just different, but we have to be consistent unless we can think of a good rule to distinguish. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would like someone to explain why this simple Rule became so convoluted and not understandable. I don't recall it EVER becoming an issue for controversy before it was redone.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
My opinion... Definitely the unrated version. Agreed...my opinion of course. Now that James mentioned it, however, I would be interested to know whether or not that might have been the reason for the change...or something else completely. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Ken said in the other thread that he "Clarified it" because 2 groups of people were reading the rule 2 different ways. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,621 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unrated should be the one profiled for runtime and all that, but if both versions are on the disc and there are rating reasons for the rated version on the back cover, then we should be able to contribute those IMO.
99% of unrated would be the same rating if submitted, it's just a buzzword to sell more dvds.
Currently I'm keeping all these reasons local, for a while they were being accepted but that seems to have changed lately, so I don't bother submitting them anymore. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
I still don't really get how your rating systems work.
In Germany the whole DVD gets the rating of the content with the highest rating.
This may result in the strange: Main Feature FSK-0 (suitable for all audiences) and a Trailer with FSK-18 (not allowed for people under 18) -> the whole DVD having an FSK-18 (This is sometimes even used for merchandising purposes).
Since this is DVD-Profiler and not Movie-Profiler (as quite often stated), we would duly enter the FSK-18 for the DVD, all else would lead to endless discussions on sources.
So if for some incomprehensible reasons your rating organization seems to think that R is a higher rating than NR, so be it. We do not interpret data, we enter it. So, it was me to vote "Other". Unless someone can explain to me how the US rating system works I can see no reason to choose another rating than the one imprinted on the cover, whichever this may be. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Ken said in the other thread that he "Clarified it" because 2 groups of people were reading the rule 2 different ways. Then with all due respect to ken, he bungled it. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|