Really impress to see the other thread locked when no solution was find and that it was not even the question asked.

So I will not answer to the poll since it's obviously a directed one...

The solution is simple and don't need the creation of a false imaginative rating at all...

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
We need to decide whether the new "Unrated" rating will also apply to titles marked "Not Rated" or "NR", and not marked "Unrated", but which previously received a theatrical rating.

I don't quite understand what is meant by the above quoted paragraph, and I'd like a clarification before I vote. What kind of titles are we talking about? Some examples would be great.

edited to add: Maybe I was tired or something... obviously it refers to new cuts of movies that were never resubmitted for a new rating.

Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Really impress to see the other thread locked when no solution was find and that it was not even the question asked.

So I will not answer to the poll since it's obviously a directed one...

The solution is simple and don't need the creation of a false imaginative rating at all...

One very important thing I noted in this was "Parental Control" that alone makes it a local issue, Parental Control not User Control. I know people here in DC who would not show something like In Harm's Way, because it's a war film and they don't approve of war. I know other's who will not show a Disney fil;m because they are pure fantasy...go figure. I don't agre with either one of those but, hey it's their life. This is kind of a similar thing Parental Control and kudos to those users for exercising some control over what their children watch. A short term Rule modification is only going to cause more trouble and a long term solution is very easy as AESP noted, though I think I would make a more versatile block, especially given that it should be a local issue, so allow for Age or a more detailed description ala MPAA if a user desires, whatever works best for him/her.

This question is kind of a toss up with me, I kind of like the idea of "Also apply to "NR" titles which previously received a theatrical rating" but at the same time I can see the complications that could come with that decision.

At this point I am just thrilled we are getting the Unrated added! 

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
A short term Rule modification is only going to cause more trouble and a long term solution is very easy as AESP noted.

We are on the same page on this
I don't see the need to create a monster for something that can be done as a personalize option. The solution that Ken had choosen will create more trouble than anything else (just wait for it).

Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
Please post this in the feature requests forum.

Why? I'm not the one who had a problem with the way it works actually.

Because it's a feature request?

Went with "Apply only where "Unrated" or similar is on the cover".

IMO, since it is more common than not that the Not Rated goes to the film that has never been rated in the Home Video field, it should be that way here, too.


Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
At this point I am just thrilled we are getting the Unrated added!

 

Quoting Forget_the_Rest:

Quote:

By all means though, don't make a request for it. I'd imagine that it's less likely to be considered for adding though.

Of course I won't, The way to do the thing here is to create more problem to correct something simple. As long as this bad idea isn't force on me I can live with it...