| Registered: July 7, 2007 |  Posts: 284 |
| | Posted: | | | | It would almost qualify as a troll post. | | | My DVD's
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard drive? |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 |  Posts: 824 |
| | Posted: | | | | Giving my honest opinion is not trolling. Usually the real trolls are the first ones to call others trolls.
"They must find it difficult... those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." - Gerald Massey | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote:
Giving my honest opinion is not trolling. Usually the real trolls are the first ones to call others trolls.
[b]
"They must find it difficult... those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." - Gerald Massey [/b] Which is why I deal with hard DATA and NOT imaginatio, or data as I want it to be.  Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote:
You want to accept an incorrect UPC scan over a correct one?
YOU guys supporting this are the ones that are "way out of line." You can't be speaking about me because I said: Quote:
The only actual documentation in those notes concerned the correct cover scan. What I meant was that his contribution notes addressed the scan issue but only that. On the whole, howver, there was enough wrong with his notes (as Unicus quoted them) to make a NO vote appropriate. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,506 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting kdh1949: Quote:
Quoting Grendell:
Quote:
You want to accept an incorrect UPC scan over a correct one?
YOU guys supporting this are the ones that are "way out of line."
You can't be speaking about me because I said:
Quote:
The only actual documentation in those notes concerned the correct cover scan.
What I meant was that his contribution notes addressed the scan issue but only that. On the whole, howver, there was enough wrong with his notes (as Unicus quoted them) to make a NO vote appropriate. In addition to that, although we can only cast one vote, it is possible for the screeners to decline the info part of the contribution but accept the cover scan (& vice versa). This may not have been the case here but it is possible. It sounds like the notes were fine for the cover so it may be that the screener still felt that the existing scan was better even if it was for a different release, only they'll know for certain. |
|