Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: October 7, 2012 10:46 AM | | | | Quite correct, swiss. Some seem to look for something to be upset about. The bond 50 group will have their proper cover scans and the stand balones theirs | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: October 8, 2012 5:34 PM | | | | yeh, totally forgot that they will have an EAN code  excuse moi Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 129 |
| Posted: October 10, 2012 7:21 PM | | | | Quoting KinoNiki: Quote:
That said, shouldn't the UK online covers be of the inner book-packaging rather than the outer casing? I've gone with the discs themselves in their slots, oriented so the title is clearly readable. Apart from a minor cheat - I retouched out part of the red dress of Jane Seymour's to the right of Diamonds Are Forever for a cleaner look - everything nice and easy. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 1,125 |
| Posted: October 20, 2012 5:00 PM | | | | I see a Norweigan profile for the James Bond 50th collection, but not a USA one yet. What's the delay, Invelos? Was there a problem with the one which was submitted? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 554 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 1,125 |
| Posted: October 22, 2012 2:34 PM | | | | Quoting Rizor: Quote: The US collection shows up just fine for me. I still couldn't find one doing a string search for "James Bond" What UPC do you have? What release date? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 3,202 |
| Posted: October 22, 2012 3:18 PM | | | | Bond 50 is the title. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 1,125 |
| Posted: October 23, 2012 4:42 PM | | | | Hi. Found it! Thanks KinoNiki. I should've guessed or looked at the title on the Blu-ray set or this thread title. For artwork of the child profiles, I've used custom images; as it looks horrible having so many identical thumbnail images in a row. |
|