Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Previous   Next
parsing Carter Cash?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Quoting surfeur51:
Quote:
A contributor not familiar with French, and who does not want to make any research, will enter JEAN PAUL BELMONDO as Jean/Paul/Belmondo.

And why is this a problem?

---------------


Because "Jean Paul" is his first name!
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Combing First and middle name into a signle field would seemingly not hurt anything and solve some problems.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote:
Combing First and middle name into a signle field would seemingly not hurt anything and solve some problems.


Not enough to be worth it, IMHO.

A single name field is the only way to eliminate parsing problems.
Hal
 Last edited: by hal9g
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree... if we can't get to a one name field I don't see enough advantage to going to 2.... may as well stay with the three we have.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,735
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
A single name field is the only way to eliminate parsing problems.

DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,850
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
And why is this a problem?

Because "Jean Paul" is his first name!

And I see a space between two names.

So why is it a problem again?  Whether it is parsed Jean / Paul / Lastname or Jean Paul // Lastname it will display the same and it will sort the same.

Since there is a space between "Jean" and "Paul" it makes sense to split it into two fields because doing so has no negative consequences, unless some people absolutely refuse to do so just because they know it's supposed to be one name.

---------------
 Last edited: by scotthm
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,735
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Since there is a space between "Jean" and "Paul" it makes since to split it into two fields because doing so has no negative consequences, unless some people absolutely refuse to do so just because they know it's supposed to be one name.

I agree with you, but there's the problem right there: we have such users... The entire question here is not so much "how should we do it?", but "how do we get everyone on the same page?" Personally, I don't intimately know most people that I enter into DVD Profiler, and as such, often I can't be entirely sure on how to parse their name. And "documentation" is pretty much nonexistent. So basically, I'd be willing to accept whatever the rules tell me to do, I'm willing to go either way. The one thing I want, is that I'm making the same call as everyone else - not what we have now, that I submit a name as 1/2/3 into one profile, and then when I audit the next profile find that the online has that same name as 1 2//3, showing up as a difference in my contribution when I didn't even touch it, while I'm contributing an entirely different change, and then causing no-votes. That's what I hate about parsing...
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,850
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
The entire question here is not so much "how should we do it?", but "how do we get everyone on the same page?"

Considering the things argued about in these forums, I don't think there is any solution that can get us there.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,735
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'm afraid you're right, yeah. Still, it's unfortunate. Just a couple of days ago I worked on a TV season, and there were twelve (!) names where my local parsing was different than the parsing in the online variant of that profile. So when I wanted to submit that completely redone, "as credited" set of cast and crew data, I had to go back and change the parsing of twelve names, divided over the cast and crew sections, then contribute, and then fix them all back again. And I actually went through that ordeal this time, but I imagine many people just don't bother anymore, and I can certainly imagine me not bothering with that anymore if this keeps getting worse.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
And why is this a problem?

Because "Jean Paul" is his first name!

And I see a space between two names.

So why is it a problem again?  Whether it is parsed Jean / Paul / Lastname or Jean Paul // Lastname it will display the same and it will sort the same.

Since there is a space between "Jean" and "Paul" it makes sense to split it into two fields because doing so has no negative consequences, unless some people absolutely refuse to do so just because they know it's supposed to be one name.



---------------


Because, if you will go to the screen where we enter a new cast member, you will see that it asks for three separate fields: First Name, Middle Name, Last Name.  This person's first name is "Jean Paul".  It is not Jean.  Therefore, it would be incorrect to enter "Paul" in the "Middle Name" field.

I actually didn't think I would need to explain this as it is pretty self-evident.
Hal
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Since there is a space between "Jean" and "Paul" it makes since to split it into two fields because doing so has no negative consequences, unless some people absolutely refuse to do so just because they know it's supposed to be one name.

I agree with you, but there's the problem right there: we have such users... The entire question here is not so much "how should we do it?", but "how do we get everyone on the same page?" Personally, I don't intimately know most people that I enter into DVD Profiler, and as such, often I can't be entirely sure on how to parse their name. And "documentation" is pretty much nonexistent. So basically, I'd be willing to accept whatever the rules tell me to do, I'm willing to go either way. The one thing I want, is that I'm making the same call as everyone else - not what we have now, that I submit a name as 1/2/3 into one profile, and then when I audit the next profile find that the online has that same name as 1 2//3, showing up as a difference in my contribution when I didn't even touch it, while I'm contributing an entirely different change, and then causing no-votes. That's what I hate about parsing...


None of this would matter if we had a proper linking system!
Hal
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
The entire question here is not so much "how should we do it?", but "how do we get everyone on the same page?"

Considering the things argued about in these forums, I don't think there is any solution that can get us there.

---------------


One name field would get everyone on the same page.
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,735
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
I actually didn't think I would need to explain this as it is pretty self-evident.

A quick glance through the database will show you that it isn't that self-evident to most users. You'd be suprised at the amount of people who'd vote vote "no" to something like that without even giving it so much as a moment's thought.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
I actually didn't think I would need to explain this as it is pretty self-evident.

A quick glance through the database will show you that it isn't that self-evident to most users. You'd be suprised at the amount of people who'd vote vote "no" to something like that without even giving it so much as a moment's thought.


I wasn't implying that it was self-evident to the users who are contributing in general.  I was addressing this particular actor in this particular thread who has been identified to have the first name of "Jean Paul".  Nothing more.
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,850
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
if you will go to the screen where we enter a new cast member, you will see that it asks for three separate fields: First Name, Middle Name, Last Name. 

I actually didn't think I would need to explain this as it is pretty self-evident.

Thank you very much for condescending to help me understand this very complex issue.

Now, tell me again why it matters since Jean / Paul / Lastname and Jean Paul // Lastname both display and sort the same?

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Now, tell me again why it matters since Jean / Paul / Lastname and Jean Paul // Lastname both display and sort the same?

---------------


That's why I suggested making it two fields: family name and given name (where we would place both first and middle name if applicable). If we could change the default display order per person, that would also handle Asian names without messing up sorts.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Previous   Next