If shelved, would you still consider Unrated, if only for local use?

Because, man, otherwise that's just teasing.

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
However, we would still need to address the current rule. I don't think that leaving the rule how it now stands is what people are after.

Ken using the personalize area like I've suggested can work for what you want to do. Of course it isn't an immediate solution and it needs a version update, but without changing anything in the rating system that gives an option to control the parental control system.

This is a pic that I've made for a feature request poll about this, but since I don't need to do it anymore.

Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
If shelved, would you still consider Unrated, if only for local use?

Because, man, otherwise that's just teasing.

While better then nothing at all... I would still prefer it to be contributable... I just do not like a local only solution. I hate the idea of everyone doing all the work themselves. 

The problem is that not everyone want to have this force fed to them. It's normal that the people who want this change had to do the work and not the ones who don't want it...

Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
The problem is that not everyone want to have this force fed to them. It's normal that the people who want this change had to do the work and not the ones who don't want it...

We are not asking you to do the work... if you don't want it just don't accept the work we do. I don't see a problem with that.

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
It was a commonly asked question - which rating to use for titles with both an NR and a rated version.  This, as well as a somewhat common complaint that there is no built-in way to filter these unrated titles  when letting kids pick out a movie.  You set the rating filter to "less than R" and you end up with a bunch of titles included that are not appropriate (like 'Hangover: Unrated').

Commonly asked question, where, Ken. I have never seen it here before. And I think it's safe to say that had it been a big issue here I would know about it. So now major changes to the Program that affect everybody can be made simply on the basis of a Support Ticket or a PM. UmmKen, I really hate to say this but when the screeners are permitted by whatever means to ignore the Rules anyway, then we essentially don't have Rules anyway, and this happens all too often

Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:

Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
If shelved, would you still consider Unrated, if only for local use?

Because, man, otherwise that's just teasing.

While better then nothing at all... I would still prefer it to be contributable... I just do not like a local only solution. I hate the idea of everyone doing all the work themselves. 

I want it contributable as well.

Ace:

Don't take this personally. I am not interested in Rating by Ace or anyone else being forced upon me. I do MY own ratings, outside of the MPAA and they are mine, i would not think of imposing my standards on yo or someone else, don't even dream that you can ort should impose yours on me, that is simply and completely UNACCEPTABLE. Parental controls are unique to each person not common to the Community.

I don't quite understand the whole 'kiddie movie' argument against this. Do people not check the DVD case when pulling it for their kids, or do you trust DVD Profiler so much that if it's NR it must be safe.

Can someone explain that?

Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
The problem is that not everyone want to have this force fed to them. It's normal that the people who want this change had to do the work and not the ones who don't want it...

We are not asking you to do the work... if you don't want it just don't accept the work we do. I don't see a problem with that.

There are certainly things that are submitted that I don't like, I just don't accept them. I understand why they are submittable, and I have no problem clicking no to them.

Quoting Skip:

Quote:
Don't take this personally. I am not interested in Rating by Ace or anyone else being forced upon me. I do MY own ratings, outside of the MPAA and they are mine, i would not think of imposing my standards on yo or someone else, don't even dream that you can ort should impose yours on me, that is simply and completely UNACCEPTABLE. Parental controls are unique to each person not common to the Community. 

You are very passionate about fighting this, but by your own words, you do your own ratings, outside MPAA. So, in essence, the way the system is currently, are standards being forced upon you anyway? That doesn't even make sense to what you are arguing against. Unless you want ratings to go away altogether. 

The "Unrated" and "Not Rated" ratings are not Ace's standards. They aren't my standards. They aren't your standards. They are the industry's standards.